Recommended Security Article Could be Censoring Findings

So I was reading along in the Hack Liberty Privacy and Security Resources when I came across an interesting article to read:

Sounded worth my time. However, I ran across one part of in particular, that just felt, off, listed under the Video unblurring section. It told how on a mainstream German news channel (Y-Kollektiv, or funk) didn’t properly obfuscate a reporter’s email address. In the picture the article gives, it’s censored, of course. And also of course, the link to the original documentary was not given.

Although I thought: “Why are you attempting to censor what is already publicly known?” They mentioned “The mishaps have been fixed”. So I turned to the archived link just to prove the point in my head. There’s ways to get around the censorship, and a security company should know that and be transparent. The first save of the video on archive.org was year before the article was published. However, when I compared the two videos, It seemed to be redacted fine. So maybe they waited a year for disclosure, maybe they found it before archive bot did, and maybe… But the same thing happened for the other example [archived link]. Except that was two years before before the article was written.

It appears to me that something else if afoot, but I turn to others so they may critic or agree with my findings

I’m not sure that the time of the article being published has any relevance to the examples given.

I’m just saying their old examples, and it seems strange that they would catch them, multiple times before archive bot did